Chronic soft back pain is the grea...

Chronic soft back pain is the greatest in quantity common obstacle to normal activity for parts younger than 45 years. undivided survey showed that 54 percent of patients who reported back or neck pain had undergone alternative therapies of that kind as acupuncture. Until recently, chiefly studies of acupuncture as therapy for reasonable back pain have had major limitations. In light of the fresh publication of several well-designed, randomized controll trials, Manheimer and colleagues performed a meta-analysis to determine the short-term effectiveness of acupuncture in treating gentle back pain.

The authors performed a thorough literature search that included reports written in Germanic and Romance languages (including English), Japanese, Chinese, and Korean. Thirty-three studies comparing acupuncture to sham treatment or no therapy met inclusion criteria, which required random assignment of patients to intervention and direct groups and data on single in kind or more of the following outcomes: pain, measures of functional status, overall improvement, time to go [i]or[/i] come back to work, and analgesic use. For the design of this analysis, acupuncture was broadly defined as any intervention that involved the insertion of needle into the skin for reasons other than injection.

inquiry size ranged from 17 to 262 patients. Studies were classified into subgroup based upon the duration of back pain, phraseology of acupuncture (i.e., Chinese, Japanese, Western), and image of treatment, if any, provided to the have the direction of group. Control groups received therapies like as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, spinal manipulation, physical therapy, and massage. Acupuncture assign places tos underwent multiple sessions per week.

Because of limited data and heterogeneity of studies onward acute low back pain, the authors were unable to draw any conclusions about the usefulness of acupuncture for this condition. However, all three designations of acupuncture were more effective statistically at relieving chronic gentle back pain (i.e., lasting longer than three months) compared with sham treatment or no therapy. When this treatment force was applied to a visual analogue scale and standard disability score previously established on members of the Cochrane Collaboration, it also reached clinical significance. Spinal manipulation was more effective than acupuncture in sum of two units studies.

The authors determine that acupuncture appears to be beneficial for the treatment of chronic soft back pain. Acupuncture was not base to be more effective than other active therapies.

Manheimer E et al. Meta-analysis: acupuncture for soft back pain. Ann Intern M April 19 2005;142:651-63

COPYRIGHT 2006 American Academy of Family Physicians

COPYRIGHT 2006 Gale Group