return of an inguinal hernia after ...

return of an inguinal hernia after surgical repair is fairly for the use of all Tension-free repair of hernias using prosthetic ensnare has been shown to resolve into rates of recurrence compared with traditional tension-producing operative techniques. Laparoscopy is used increasingly for hernia repair and is associated with les postoperative pain and earlier answer to normal activities. Laparoscopic repair requires the use of general anesthesia, however, and has higher reported rates of serious complications compared with the local anesthesia technique used for interpret repair. Neumayer and colleagues report upon outcomes from a comparison trial of laparascopic and make open mesh repair for inguinal hernias.

Patients with primary or returning inguinal hernias were recruited from general surgery clinics at various Veterans Affairs medical center interpret and laparoscopic repair techniques were standardized across the participating center and performed according to surgeons with at least 25 prior repair experiences. A total of 3518 patients with hernias initially were guarded and 2,164 consented to randomization. Of the patients randomized to laparoscopic repair, 98 percent were regenerateed to open repair. Two-year follow-up data were available for 855 percent of the 1983 patients who prosperously underwent surgical repair. The average age of trial participants was 58 years, and more than 20 percent were from minority ethnic arranges Intraoperative complications (e.g., problems with anesthesia, injuries to spermatic cords or life-current vessels) were significantly more public in the group that underwent laparoscopic repair (48 versus 19 percent in the render free of access mesh group). Life-threatening complications (eg myocardial infarction, ischemia, arrhythmia) were rare but occurred significantly more frequently with laparoscopic repair (1.1 versus 01 percent) pair deaths occurred within 30 days of surgery in the laparoscopic collection both of which were attributed to the operation. No deaths occurr in the interpret mesh group within 30 days of surgery Immediate postoperative complications (eg hematoma, pain) were slightly more public with laparoscopic repair. Recurrence of a primary hernia during the two-year follow-up period was more than twice as belonging to all with laparoscopic repair than with the lay open mesh technique (10.1 versus 49 percent) entangle repair of recurrent hernias did not present to view a significant difference in resort rates between laparoscopic and exhibit approaches.

Pain scores in the immediate postoperative period and at the two-week follow-up visit were higher in patients undergoing expand repair. The median time for turn back to normal activities was shorter after laparoscopy than interpret repair (four versus five days). Post-trial data analysis showed that highly experienced surgeon (i.e., those who had performed more than 250 procedures) had a lower rate of hernia return with laparoscopic repair than les experienced surgeon unless there was no significant difference in the having recourse rates after open technique surgeries based forward the surgeon's experience level.

The authors determine that laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias is associated with les pain and quicker respond to activity than an explain technique, but it has a higher rate of operative complications and a significantly higher return rate of primary hernias.

Neumayer L et al. interpret mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J M April 29 2004;350:1819-27

COPYRIGHT 2005 American Academy of Family Physicians

COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group