| Ask4articles.info |
|
|
![]() |
This statement summarizes the U Pre...This statement summarizes the U Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations onward the primary care clinician's part in the prevention of dental disease among preschool-aged children based forward the USPSTF's examination of evidence specific to dental disease in young children. It updates the 1996 recommendations contained in the Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, secondary edition. (1) Explanations of the ratings and potency of overall evidence are given in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. The unbroken information on which this statement is based, including evidence tables and hints is available in the summary article, "Physicians' characters in preventing dental caries in preschool children: a summary of the evidence for the U Preventive Services Task Force," (2) and in the systematic evidence review, "Dental Caries Prevention: The Physician's part in Child Oral Health." (3) The USPSTF recommendations, the accompanying summary article, and the perfect systematic evidence review are available between the walls of the USPSTF Web site (www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov). The summary article and the USPSTF recommendations and rationale statement are available in print end the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse (telephone: 1-800-358-9295; e-mail: ahrqpubs@ahrq.gov). The recommendation also is supported on the Web site of the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guideline.gov). This recommendation first appeared in Am J Prev M 2004;26:326-9 Summary of Recommendations * The USPSTF attract favor tos that primary care clinicians prescribe oral fluoride supplementation at generally recommended dosages to preschool-aged children older than six month of age whose primary water source is deficient in fluoride. B recommendation. The USPSTF place fair evidence that, in preschool-aged children with soft fluoride exposure, prescription of oral fluoride fill ups by primary care physicians leads to reduc dental caries. The USPSTF conclud that the benefits of caries prevention using oral fluoride supplementation outweigh the potential harms of dental fluorosis, which in the United States are primarily observ as a mild cosmetic discoloration of the teeth The USPSTF judges that the evidence is insufficient to commend for or against routine risk assessment of preschool-aged children on primary care physicians for the prevention of dental disease. I recommendation. * The USPSTF fix no validated risk-assessment tools or algorithms for assessing dental disease risk on primary care physicians and little evidence that primary care physicians are able to systematically assess risk for dental disease among preschool-aged children. The USPSTF further lay the foundation of little evidence that either counseling of parents or referring high-risk children to dental care providers originates in fewer caries or reduc dental disease. Thus, the USPSTF conclud there is insufficient evidence to determine the balance between the benefits and harms of routine risk assessment to debar dental disease among preschool children. Clinical Considerations * Dental disease is prevalent among young children, particularly those from lower socioeconomic populations; however, not many preschool-aged children ever visit a dentist. Primary care physicians are repeatedly the first and only health professionals whom children visit. Therefore, they are in a unique position to address dental disease in these children. * Fluoride varnishes, professionally applied topical fluorides approved to stop dental caries in young children, are adjuncts to oral supplementation. Their advantages through other topical fluoride agents (i.e., opening rinse and gel) include ease of use, patient acceptance, and reduc potential for toxicity. * Dental fluorosis (rather than skeletal fluorosis) is the in the greatest degree common harm of either oral fluoride or fluoride toothpaste use in children younger than couple years in the United States. Dental fluorosis is typically same mild and only of aesthetic importance. The commended dosage of fluoride supplementation was reduc according to the American Dental Association in 1994 which is likely to decrease the prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis. The instant dosage recommendations are based in succession the fluoride level of the local community's water endue and are available online at http://www.ada.org. The primary care physician's knowledge of the fluoride flush of his or her patients' primary water serve instead of ensures appropriate fluoride supplementation and minimizes risk for fluorosis. Discussion Dental caries is a customary childhood disease: as many as 19 percent of children aged brace to five years and 52 percent of children aged five to nine years have experienced dental caries. (45) Minority and economically disadvantaged children have a higher prevalence and severity of caries compared with other collections (3) Untreated caries in primary teeth may lead to caries in permanent teeth and a possible los of arch space. (3) Although a first dental visit is make acceptableed when a child is approximately common year old, (6) only 36 percent of two- to four-year-olds have had a dental visit in the past year; thus, primary care physicians have a character in providing access to preventive dental services, particularly for real young and disadvantaged children. (5) The USPSTF reviewed the evidence for the prevention and management of dental caries in children up to five years of age. The review did not shroud the evidence for water fluoridation, application of dental sealants, or prenatal counseling. However, based in succession strong evidence, the Centers for Disease dominion government and Prevention Task Force upon Community Preventive Services has commended that local water fluoridation be a part of a population-based strategy for the prevention of tooth decay in communities. The recommendation can be accessed at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/oral/. |
![]() |
Other Articles
-Feb. 1-8: Medicine of div...-Clinical Quiz questions a... -Jun. 18-21, 2003: WONCA r... -The surge of interest in ... -What kind of diet will he... -Oct. 1-5, 2003: New Orlea... -What does it take to lose... -Isolating persons infecte... -On page 77 of this issue,... -What should I eat when tr... -The U.S. Surgeon General'... -Echinacea is the name of ... -The Centers for Medicare ... -What is echinacea? Echi... -The navicular bone of the... -Technology-intensive chil... -A peer-reviewed, Web-base... -The 2003 Recommended Chil... -Diabetic patients who req... -The dryness of the skin's... -* Essure System. The U.S.... -The Centers for Disease C... -* Oats: you gotta love 'e... -The administration of inf... -Alabama Feb. 24-25: Spi... -The Cochrane Abstract bel... -The Department of Health ... -Clinical Quiz questions a... -Patients with hypertensio... -Jan. 17-19: Headache now ... -Case Scenario Yellowing... -Jun. 20-27: 7th diabetes ... -Monday We shouldn't tre... -Results of a new study by... -* Commit Lozenge. The Com... -A new report by the Insti... -This is one in a series e... -The Committee on Practice... -A new booklet of guidelin... -What is histoplasmosis? ... -Approximately 192,200 wom... -Monday "We promised her... -Histoplasmosis is an ende... -What is breast-conserving... -As someone who has had a ... -The Recommended Adult Imm... -Alaska May 16-18: Pract... -* Fashion could be harmfu... -Although celiac disease w... -Jan. 4-17: Communication ... -In a recent column, I men... -The interrupted horizonta... -Jun. 20-27: 7th diabetes ... -Jun. 18-21, 2003: WONCA r... -The article "Prealbumin: ... -Oct. 1-5, 2003: New Orlea... -The Department of Health ... -The Minnesota Health Tech... -The Agency for Healthcare... |
| . |