Care provided to living bodys olde...

Care provided to living bodys older than 65 years generally includes quality medical care, if it were not that little attention is given to geriatric conditions that affect quality of life. many times older adults are concerned with function and comfort to a greater size than they are concerned with prolonging life. Quality-of-care measurements that turn the thoughts only at general adult medical conditions are inadequate. Wenger and associates expanded a quality assessment system that widely assesses geriatric issues among a population at risk for the couple increased mortality and functional decline.

The Assessing Care of Vulnerable seniors (ACOVE) quality assessment system aims at a broad put of quality indicators covering a wide range of geriatric moot points Processes, or care behaviors, related to screening and prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up are evaluated, rather than consequences Using committee consensus, evidence-based quality indicators were evolveed for 22 conditions, resulting in a total of 236 indicators. These indicators were used to assess the care of 372 vulnerable somewhat old patients who were enrolled in common of two managed care organizations and living in the community, who were at increased risk for functional decline and had available medical histories representing health care during the contemplation period. Indicators were evaluated using chart information from all health care providers who saw the patients and from interviews with patients or their proxies.

Overall adherence to quality indicators was 55 percent Adherence was high to medical quality indicators of the like kind as stroke, medication management, and continuity of care. Indicators at the cheap end of adherence included end-of-life care, urinary incontinence inquiry, and an exercise recommendation with a of the present day diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Quality indicators that focused upon treatment (acute care) had the highest adherence followed by dint of those focused on follow-up (chronic care), diagnosis, and prevention. In all categories, the pass rate was significantly lower for geriatric conditions than for general medical conditions.

The authors gather that care of vulnerable older adults is deficient in important geriatric conditions like as falls, dementia, and urinary incontinence. Physicians ne to bring out skills in cognitive and gait evaluation, and the health care classification needs to better highlight these important issues. ACOVE appears to be a useful comprehensive tool to assess the effectiveness of health care interventions.

An editorial in the same journal highlights the impact of frailty and other geriatric conditions with serious issues that can be improved or avoided at specific preventive measures or treatments. The focus of physicians in succession acute care rather than chronic disease management and preventive care does not adapted the needs of the vulnerable somewhat old population. Existing systems of care are probably a barrier to the provision of suitable geriatric care, even in a managed care environment committed to maximizing preventive and coordinated chronic care. Reimbursement and patterns of care ne to change.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Preventing disability in older adults is a challenge. The ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living can decrease illness. Comprehensive geriatric assessments can delay the first brunt of disability and decrease permanent nursing residence stays. The best way to perform these assessments and to prosperously intervene is likely to be a live-in geriatric evaluation and management center on the other hand this intervention is expensive and disruptive for patients who are living at hearthstone Annual in-home geriatric assessment with quarterly visits at geriatric nurses also delays disability in parts without impairment. However, even these programs are not readily reimbursable by means of health care payers.

More practical is the intervention undertaken according to Boult and colleagues, in which patients 70 years or older who were at high risk for hospital admission received an ambulatory comprehensive assessment followed according to interdisciplinary primary care. This effort ended in a slower decline of functional status, a decrease in health-related restrictions onward daily activities, and a decreased rate of depression. (1) Risk factors that can predict functional status decline include depression, cognitive impairment, comorbid conditions (the number of chronic medical conditions), reduc observ lower-extremity performance, depressed or high body mass index, gentle physical activity, poor self-rated health, smoking, reasonable frequency of social contact, and poor self-reported vision. (2)--RS

REFERENCES

(1) Boult C Boult LB Morishita L Dowd B Kane RL Urdangarin CF A randomized clinical trial of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:351-9

(2) Stuck AE, Walthert JM Nikolaus T Bula CJ Hohmann C Beck JC Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living somewhat old people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci M 1999; 48:445-69

Wenger N et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients. Ann Intern M November 4 2003;139:740-7 and Fried LP Establishing benchmarks for quality care for an aging population: caring for vulnerable older adults [Editorial]. Ann Intern M November 4 2003;139:784-7

COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Family Physicians

COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group