The major issue in young children w...

The major issue in young children who at hand with a fever is to distinguish between those who will have an quiet course and those who are at risk of serious morbidity or mortality. The American literary institution [i]or[/i] seminary of learning of Emergency Physicians reviewed the evidence to unravel guidelines for the evaluation of young children with fever

Guidelines were cause to growed by grouping together specific questions. The first question involves age cutoffs for different strategies. Because serious bacterial infections repeatedly were missed in children 28 days or younger, infants in this age range should be presum to have a serious infection. The secondary question involves whether a rejoinder to antipyretic medication is associated with a lower likelihood of serious bacterial infection in young children. The evidence does not support this relationship. The third question involves indications for chest radiograph in children with excitement There appears to be fair evidence that a chest radiograph should be obtained in children three month or younger when there is evidence of pulmonary infection. In children older than three month the indications for chest radiography are les clear, although there is an opinion that chest radiography be considered in children with a temperature greater than 1022[degrees] F (39[degrees] C) and a white progeny cell (WBC) count greater than 20000 confined apartments per [mm.sup.3] (20 x [10sup9] small cavitys per L). In children older than three month with excitement but no elevated WBC enumerate radiography is not indicated if there are no symptoms of acute pulmonary disease.

Because urinary tract infections are a public cause of fever among young children, the fourth question considers which febrile children are at risk for urinary infection. Urinary tract infection should be considered in children younger than single year who have no other obvious source of infection. There is fair evidence that girls aged single to two years without any other source of febrile disease should be considered at risk for urinary tract infection. The fifth question involves the best way to accumulate urine for examination and notes fair evidence supporting urethral catheterization or suprapubic aspiration. The sixth question involves the symbols of testing to be done forward properly obtained urine and point out tos fair evidence for obtaining a urine tillage in conjunction with other urine studies in children younger than brace years because a negative urine dipstick exhibition or microscopic examination cannot reliably command out an infection.

The seventh question involves the prevalence of secret bacteremia in children aged three to 36 month and the frequent occurrence of serious outcomes. The prevalence of shrouded bacteremia is approximately 1.5 to 20 percent in febrile children in this age collection and approximately 5 to 20 percent of cases progres to a serious negative issue The final question involves the use of empiric antibiotic treatment among previously healthy febrile children with no obvious source of infection. Because of the possibility of serious issues even in previously healthy febrile children with no obvious source of infection, fair evidence supports the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in children aged three to 36 month with no obvious infection source who have a temperature higher than 1022[degrees] F and whose WBC calculate is at least 15,000 small cavitys per [mm.sup.3] (15 x [10sup9] confined apartments per L). Close follow-up is recommended for all febrile children when empiric antibiotics are not given.

In an editorial in the same issue, Baraff notes that the rate of invisible bacteremia has decreased since the introduction of the pneumococcal and Haemophilus influenzae vaccines. He also notes that urine infered using a "bagged" technique usually is contaminated and not acceptable for analysis, that oscillation oximetry is useful in addition to other signs of acute respiratory disease in the consideration of chest radiography, and that febrile children 28 days to three month of age can be treated in succession an ambulatory basis if they are lay the foundation of to be at low risk for serious infection.

American community of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Committee. Clinical policy for children younger than three years presenting to the crisis department with fever. Ann Emerg M Oct 2003;42:530-45 and Baraff LJ Clinical policy for children younger than three years presenting to the urgency department with fever [Editorial]. Ann Emerg M Oct 2003;42:546-9

COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Family Physicians

COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group